Instagram Story Viewer
Ver Historias de Instagram Anónimamente
code__magazine
CODE
PRINT ISSUE 04 AVAILABLE NOW
CODE 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE
In a dream, the wolf moves. Through tunnels and in mirrors. In amplitudes and circuitry, and everywhere within or without a mind. She collapses the tunnel. She bites down and changes the world. However we dream it. However her pieces move.
This issue of CODE is the result of our team’s yearlong research and exploration of the quantum universe—a heady and transformative look at simultaneity and the spooky action we affect on each other across time and distances. Drawing on widely ranging topics — from chess and the poetics of anguish and love; to wave function collapse and neural media architecture; to the mysteriously universal nature and origins of consciousness itself — and with shoots from L.A. to Morocco, this is our boldest effort yet.
Featuring contributions from: Mowalola, Dylan Van Roost, Federico Campagna, Dr. Stuart Hameroff, Meriem Bennani, Arcin Sagdic, Dr. Aneil Mallavarapu, Hendrik Schneider, Ariana Reines, Melanie Glück, Jesse Seegers, Club Chess, Karl Felix, Vanessa Barros Andrade, Pierre Podevyn, Kynan Puru Watt, Jessica Mitrani
Cover 04a @mowalola photographed by @hendrik.schneider and styled by @vvutura
@grailed Archive Special
Editor in Chief & Creative Director
@mharieberger
Art Director
@mariefaass
Managing Editor
Natalie Mariko
Concept & Research
@deviantarthaute
Fashion Editors
@vvutura
@intl_4evr
@_nicowalker_
@aaaeeeffflll
Writers
Natalie Mariko
@deviantarthaute
@j3ss3s33g3rs
@ellena.basada
@mharieberger
Editors
@cinderella_exit
@deviantarthaute
Photographers
@dylanvanroost
@arcinsagdic
@hendrik.schneider
@ynaalem
@aaaeeeffflll
@pierrepodevyn
@karlfelix__
Photo Editing
@mariefaass
Advertising
@mharieberger
Print
@gutenbergbeuys
Web
@scissor_cloud
Cusp Publishing
CODE 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE
In a dream, the wolf moves. Through tunnels and in mirrors. In amplitudes and circuitry, and everywhere within or without a mind. She collapses the tunnel. She bites down and changes the world. However we dream it. However her pieces move.
This issue of CODE is the result of our team’s yearlong research and exploration of the quantum universe—a heady and transformative look at simultaneity and the spooky action we affect on each other across time and distances. Drawing on widely ranging topics — from chess and the poetics of anguish and love; to wave function collapse and neural media architecture; to the mysteriously universal nature and origins of consciousness itself — and with shoots from L.A. to Morocco, this is our boldest effort yet.
Featuring contributions from: Mowalola, Dylan Van Roost, Federico Campagna, Dr. Stuart Hameroff, Meriem Bennani, Arcin Sagdic, Dr. Aneil Mallavarapu, Hendrik Schneider, Ariana Reines, Melanie Glück, Jesse Seegers, Club Chess, Karl Felix, Vanessa Barros Andrade, Pierre Podevyn, Kynan Puru Watt, Jessica Mitrani
Cover 04a @mowalola photographed by @hendrik.schneider and styled by @vvutura
@grailed Archive Special
Editor in Chief & Creative Director
@mharieberger
Art Director
@mariefaass
Managing Editor
Natalie Mariko
Concept & Research
@deviantarthaute
Fashion Editors
@vvutura
@intl_4evr
@_nicowalker_
@aaaeeeffflll
Writers
Natalie Mariko
@deviantarthaute
@j3ss3s33g3rs
@ellena.basada
@mharieberger
Editors
@cinderella_exit
@deviantarthaute
Photographers
@dylanvanroost
@arcinsagdic
@hendrik.schneider
@ynaalem
@aaaeeeffflll
@pierrepodevyn
@karlfelix__
Photo Editing
@mariefaass
Advertising
@mharieberger
Print
@gutenbergbeuys
Web
@scissor_cloud
Cusp Publishing
CODE 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE
In a dream, the wolf moves. Through tunnels and in mirrors. In amplitudes and circuitry, and everywhere within or without a mind. She collapses the tunnel. She bites down and changes the world. However we dream it. However her pieces move.
This issue of CODE is the result of our team’s yearlong research and exploration of the quantum universe—a heady and transformative look at simultaneity and the spooky action we affect on each other across time and distances. Drawing on widely ranging topics — from chess and the poetics of anguish and love; to wave function collapse and neural media architecture; to the mysteriously universal nature and origins of consciousness itself — and with shoots from L.A. to Morocco, this is our boldest effort yet.
Featuring contributions from: Mowalola, Dylan Van Roost, Federico Campagna, Dr. Stuart Hameroff, Meriem Bennani, Arcin Sagdic, Dr. Aneil Mallavarapu, Hendrik Schneider, Ariana Reines, Melanie Glück, Jesse Seegers, Club Chess, Karl Felix, Vanessa Barros Andrade, Pierre Podevyn, Kynan Puru Watt, Jessica Mitrani
Cover 04b 16-4529 TPG by @arcinsagdic
Editor in Chief & Creative Director
@mharieberger
Art Director
@mariefaass
Managing Editor
Natalie Mariko
Concept & Research
@deviantarthaute
Fashion Editors
@vvutura
@intl_4evr
@_nicowalker_
@aaaeeeffflll
Writers
Natalie Mariko
@deviantarthaute
@j3ss3s33g3rs
@ellena.basada
@mharieberger
Editors
@cinderella_exit
@deviantarthaute
Photographers
@dylanvanroost
@arcinsagdic
@hendrik.schneider
@ynaalem
@aaaeeeffflll
@pierrepodevyn
@karlfelix__
Photo Editing
@mariefaass
Advertising
@mharieberger
Print
@gutenbergbeuys
Web
@scissor_cloud
Cusp Publishing
CODE 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE
In a dream, the wolf moves. Through tunnels and in mirrors. In amplitudes and circuitry, and everywhere within or without a mind. She collapses the tunnel. She bites down and changes the world. However we dream it. However her pieces move.
This issue of CODE is the result of our team’s yearlong research and exploration of the quantum universe—a heady and transformative look at simultaneity and the spooky action we affect on each other across time and distances. Drawing on widely ranging topics — from chess and the poetics of anguish and love; to wave function collapse and neural media architecture; to the mysteriously universal nature and origins of consciousness itself — and with shoots from L.A. to Morocco, this is our boldest effort yet.
Featuring contributions from: Mowalola, Dylan Van Roost, Federico Campagna, Dr. Stuart Hameroff, Meriem Bennani, Arcin Sagdic, Dr. Aneil Mallavarapu, Hendrik Schneider, Ariana Reines, Melanie Glück, Jesse Seegers, Club Chess, Karl Felix, Vanessa Barros Andrade, Pierre Podevyn, Kynan Puru Watt, Jessica Mitrani
Cover 04b 16-4529 TPG by @arcinsagdic
Editor in Chief & Creative Director
@mharieberger
Art Director
@mariefaass
Managing Editor
Natalie Mariko
Concept & Research
@deviantarthaute
Fashion Editors
@vvutura
@intl_4evr
@_nicowalker_
@aaaeeeffflll
Writers
Natalie Mariko
@deviantarthaute
@j3ss3s33g3rs
@ellena.basada
@mharieberger
Editors
@cinderella_exit
@deviantarthaute
Photographers
@dylanvanroost
@arcinsagdic
@hendrik.schneider
@ynaalem
@aaaeeeffflll
@pierrepodevyn
@karlfelix__
Photo Editing
@mariefaass
Advertising
@mharieberger
Print
@gutenbergbeuys
Web
@scissor_cloud
Cusp Publishing
Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor
Seeing is believing, right?
Maybe,
we’ll see.
The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.
What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.
The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.
Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.
The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.
Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor
Seeing is believing, right?
Maybe,
we’ll see.
The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.
What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.
The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.
Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.
The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.
Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor
Seeing is believing, right?
Maybe,
we’ll see.
The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.
What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.
The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.
Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.
The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.
Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor
Seeing is believing, right?
Maybe,
we’ll see.
The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.
What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.
The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.
Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.
The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.
Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor
Seeing is believing, right?
Maybe,
we’ll see.
The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.
What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.
The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.
Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.
The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.
Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor
Seeing is believing, right?
Maybe,
we’ll see.
The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.
What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.
The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.
Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.
The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.
Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor
Seeing is believing, right?
Maybe,
we’ll see.
The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.
What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.
The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.
Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.
The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.
Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor
Seeing is believing, right?
Maybe,
we’ll see.
The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.
What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.
The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.
Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.
The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.
Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor
Seeing is believing, right?
Maybe,
we’ll see.
The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.
What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.
The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.
Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.
The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.
Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor
Seeing is believing, right?
Maybe,
we’ll see.
The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.
What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.
The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.
Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.
The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.
Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor
Seeing is believing, right?
Maybe,
we’ll see.
The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.
What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.
The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.
Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.
The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.
Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor
Seeing is believing, right?
Maybe,
we’ll see.
The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.
What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.
The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.
Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.
The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.
Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor
Seeing is believing, right?
Maybe,
we’ll see.
The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.
What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.
The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.
Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.
The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.
Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”
As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.
Stills by @dylanvanroost
Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”
As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.
Stills by @dylanvanroost
Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”
As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.
Stills by @dylanvanroost
Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”
As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.
Stills by @dylanvanroost
Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”
As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.
Stills by @dylanvanroost
Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”
As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.
Stills by @dylanvanroost
Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”
As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.
Stills by @dylanvanroost
Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”
As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.
Stills by @dylanvanroost
Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”
As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.
Stills by @dylanvanroost
Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”
As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.
Stills by @dylanvanroost
Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”
As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.
Stills by @dylanvanroost
Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”
As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.
Stills by @dylanvanroost
Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”
As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.
Stills by @dylanvanroost
NAIMA meets CODE.
Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.
CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.
NAIMA meets CODE.
Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.
CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.
NAIMA meets CODE.
Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.
CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.
NAIMA meets CODE.
Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.
CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.
NAIMA meets CODE.
Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.
CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.
NAIMA meets CODE.
Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.
CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.
NAIMA meets CODE.
Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.
CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.
NAIMA meets CODE.
Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.
CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.
NAIMA meets CODE.
Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.
CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.
NAIMA meets CODE.
Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.
CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.
@skipfame special for CODE 04
Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor
Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting
Hair @liv_gate
Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_
Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz
@skipfame special for CODE 04
Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor
Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting
Hair @liv_gate
Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_
Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz
@skipfame special for CODE 04
Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor
Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting
Hair @liv_gate
Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_
Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz
@skipfame special for CODE 04
Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor
Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting
Hair @liv_gate
Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_
Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz
@skipfame special for CODE 04
Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor
Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting
Hair @liv_gate
Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_
Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz
@skipfame special for CODE 04
Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor
Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting
Hair @liv_gate
Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_
Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz
@skipfame special for CODE 04
Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor
Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting
Hair @liv_gate
Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_
Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz
@skipfame special for CODE 04
Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor
Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting
Hair @liv_gate
Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_
Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz
@skipfame special for CODE 04
Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor
Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting
Hair @liv_gate
Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_
Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz
“I See Me, in You, in Chess”
A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute
Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki
“I See Me, in You, in Chess”
A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute
Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki
“I See Me, in You, in Chess”
A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute
Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki
“I See Me, in You, in Chess”
A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute
Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki
“I See Me, in You, in Chess”
A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute
Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki
“I See Me, in You, in Chess”
A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute
Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki
“I See Me, in You, in Chess”
A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute
Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki
“I See Me, in You, in Chess”
A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute
Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki
“I See Me, in You, in Chess”
A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute
Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki
“I See Me, in You, in Chess”
A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute
Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki
“I See Me, in You, in Chess”
A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute
Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki
MAYBE WE’LL SEE
Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE
Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody
MAYBE WE’LL SEE
Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE
Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody
MAYBE WE’LL SEE
Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE
Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody
MAYBE WE’LL SEE
Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE
Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody
MAYBE WE’LL SEE
Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE
Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody
MAYBE WE’LL SEE
Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE
Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody
MAYBE WE’LL SEE
Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE
Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody
MAYBE WE’LL SEE
Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE
Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody
THE SELF
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special
Video Excerpts by @7.9999a
Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria
THE SELF
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special
Video Excerpts by @7.9999a
Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria
THE SELF
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special
Video Excerpts by @7.9999a
Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria
THE SELF
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special
Video Excerpts by @7.9999a
Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria
THE SELF
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special
Video Excerpts by @7.9999a
Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria
THE SELF
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special
Video Excerpts by @7.9999a
Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria
THE SELF
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special
Video Excerpts by @7.9999a
Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria
THE SELF
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special
Video Excerpts by @7.9999a
Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria
At CODE, we believe the most insightful and compelling conversations emerge in the space between disciplines. Whether through a shared language, a craft, or a curiosity that pushes beyond the boundaries of individual fields, we seek to connect the forces at play—bridging perspectives, practices, and strands of interdisciplinary research.
This reflects our broader intention: to close the gaps between communities and foster meaningful exchange. Our aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersections of art, technology, spirituality, and the sciences.
Projective Geometry is the ur-technology at the root of today’s AI-pilled-consciousness-questioning moment, yet it originated in the 1500s. Billion-dimensional token embeddings simulate language as a skeuomorph of human consciousness. What can we learn from 500 years ago to help us make sense of today?
‘Neural Media Literacy’ is an attempt at making sense of the media environment and creative landscape that new neural media technologies (AI, LLMs, Agents) have thrust upon us. Answers to the “is it conscious” question are made irrelevant in favor of reorienting the discussion towards “what effects can it have anyway?” Learning from reading topologies of network media structures, we can glimpse a new type of literacy emerging in the age of neural media.
Connecting the theoretical and mythological dots between Robin Evans’ architectural theory, the Orchestrated Objective Reduction Theory of Quantum Consciousness proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff (also in CODE issue 04), K Allado MacDowell’s history of neural media, Deadalus/Icarus Labyrinth myth, and recent video work by Freeka Tet and Amnesia Scanner, this essay is a critical meditation on emerging forms of media literacy today.
View the full essay and simulations by @j3ss3s33g3rs @spatialculturesthinkingpartner on CODE Archive — link in bio.
Slideshow:
01 LLM token embedding simulation
02 “Chapel d’Anet” (1547-52), designed by architect Philibert de l’Orme. Section perspective drawing by Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau, ca. 1570
03 Various network topologies / Network Media simulation
04-05 Rafaello, “School of Athens” (1509-1511) as schools of thought vectors, diagram by author
06 Outtake CODE 04 ‘Neural Media Literacy’
07 Decentralized topology / Network Media simulation
08 Still from music video for “AS Over” by @amnesiascanner, Directed by @freekatet
09 Distributed topology / Network Media simulation
10 Trainium GPU chip, Spencer Lowell for The New York Times
11 Centralized topology / Network Media simulation
Web Design @scissor_cloud
Projective Geometry is the ur-technology at the root of today’s AI-pilled-consciousness-questioning moment, yet it originated in the 1500s. Billion-dimensional token embeddings simulate language as a skeuomorph of human consciousness. What can we learn from 500 years ago to help us make sense of today?
‘Neural Media Literacy’ is an attempt at making sense of the media environment and creative landscape that new neural media technologies (AI, LLMs, Agents) have thrust upon us. Answers to the “is it conscious” question are made irrelevant in favor of reorienting the discussion towards “what effects can it have anyway?” Learning from reading topologies of network media structures, we can glimpse a new type of literacy emerging in the age of neural media.
Connecting the theoretical and mythological dots between Robin Evans’ architectural theory, the Orchestrated Objective Reduction Theory of Quantum Consciousness proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff (also in CODE issue 04), K Allado MacDowell’s history of neural media, Deadalus/Icarus Labyrinth myth, and recent video work by Freeka Tet and Amnesia Scanner, this essay is a critical meditation on emerging forms of media literacy today.
View the full essay and simulations by @j3ss3s33g3rs @spatialculturesthinkingpartner on CODE Archive — link in bio.
Slideshow:
01 LLM token embedding simulation
02 “Chapel d’Anet” (1547-52), designed by architect Philibert de l’Orme. Section perspective drawing by Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau, ca. 1570
03 Various network topologies / Network Media simulation
04-05 Rafaello, “School of Athens” (1509-1511) as schools of thought vectors, diagram by author
06 Outtake CODE 04 ‘Neural Media Literacy’
07 Decentralized topology / Network Media simulation
08 Still from music video for “AS Over” by @amnesiascanner, Directed by @freekatet
09 Distributed topology / Network Media simulation
10 Trainium GPU chip, Spencer Lowell for The New York Times
11 Centralized topology / Network Media simulation
Web Design @scissor_cloud
Projective Geometry is the ur-technology at the root of today’s AI-pilled-consciousness-questioning moment, yet it originated in the 1500s. Billion-dimensional token embeddings simulate language as a skeuomorph of human consciousness. What can we learn from 500 years ago to help us make sense of today?
‘Neural Media Literacy’ is an attempt at making sense of the media environment and creative landscape that new neural media technologies (AI, LLMs, Agents) have thrust upon us. Answers to the “is it conscious” question are made irrelevant in favor of reorienting the discussion towards “what effects can it have anyway?” Learning from reading topologies of network media structures, we can glimpse a new type of literacy emerging in the age of neural media.
Connecting the theoretical and mythological dots between Robin Evans’ architectural theory, the Orchestrated Objective Reduction Theory of Quantum Consciousness proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff (also in CODE issue 04), K Allado MacDowell’s history of neural media, Deadalus/Icarus Labyrinth myth, and recent video work by Freeka Tet and Amnesia Scanner, this essay is a critical meditation on emerging forms of media literacy today.
View the full essay and simulations by @j3ss3s33g3rs @spatialculturesthinkingpartner on CODE Archive — link in bio.
Slideshow:
01 LLM token embedding simulation
02 “Chapel d’Anet” (1547-52), designed by architect Philibert de l’Orme. Section perspective drawing by Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau, ca. 1570
03 Various network topologies / Network Media simulation
04-05 Rafaello, “School of Athens” (1509-1511) as schools of thought vectors, diagram by author
06 Outtake CODE 04 ‘Neural Media Literacy’
07 Decentralized topology / Network Media simulation
08 Still from music video for “AS Over” by @amnesiascanner, Directed by @freekatet
09 Distributed topology / Network Media simulation
10 Trainium GPU chip, Spencer Lowell for The New York Times
11 Centralized topology / Network Media simulation
Web Design @scissor_cloud
Projective Geometry is the ur-technology at the root of today’s AI-pilled-consciousness-questioning moment, yet it originated in the 1500s. Billion-dimensional token embeddings simulate language as a skeuomorph of human consciousness. What can we learn from 500 years ago to help us make sense of today?
‘Neural Media Literacy’ is an attempt at making sense of the media environment and creative landscape that new neural media technologies (AI, LLMs, Agents) have thrust upon us. Answers to the “is it conscious” question are made irrelevant in favor of reorienting the discussion towards “what effects can it have anyway?” Learning from reading topologies of network media structures, we can glimpse a new type of literacy emerging in the age of neural media.
Connecting the theoretical and mythological dots between Robin Evans’ architectural theory, the Orchestrated Objective Reduction Theory of Quantum Consciousness proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff (also in CODE issue 04), K Allado MacDowell’s history of neural media, Deadalus/Icarus Labyrinth myth, and recent video work by Freeka Tet and Amnesia Scanner, this essay is a critical meditation on emerging forms of media literacy today.
View the full essay and simulations by @j3ss3s33g3rs @spatialculturesthinkingpartner on CODE Archive — link in bio.
Slideshow:
01 LLM token embedding simulation
02 “Chapel d’Anet” (1547-52), designed by architect Philibert de l’Orme. Section perspective drawing by Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau, ca. 1570
03 Various network topologies / Network Media simulation
04-05 Rafaello, “School of Athens” (1509-1511) as schools of thought vectors, diagram by author
06 Outtake CODE 04 ‘Neural Media Literacy’
07 Decentralized topology / Network Media simulation
08 Still from music video for “AS Over” by @amnesiascanner, Directed by @freekatet
09 Distributed topology / Network Media simulation
10 Trainium GPU chip, Spencer Lowell for The New York Times
11 Centralized topology / Network Media simulation
Web Design @scissor_cloud
Projective Geometry is the ur-technology at the root of today’s AI-pilled-consciousness-questioning moment, yet it originated in the 1500s. Billion-dimensional token embeddings simulate language as a skeuomorph of human consciousness. What can we learn from 500 years ago to help us make sense of today?
‘Neural Media Literacy’ is an attempt at making sense of the media environment and creative landscape that new neural media technologies (AI, LLMs, Agents) have thrust upon us. Answers to the “is it conscious” question are made irrelevant in favor of reorienting the discussion towards “what effects can it have anyway?” Learning from reading topologies of network media structures, we can glimpse a new type of literacy emerging in the age of neural media.
Connecting the theoretical and mythological dots between Robin Evans’ architectural theory, the Orchestrated Objective Reduction Theory of Quantum Consciousness proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff (also in CODE issue 04), K Allado MacDowell’s history of neural media, Deadalus/Icarus Labyrinth myth, and recent video work by Freeka Tet and Amnesia Scanner, this essay is a critical meditation on emerging forms of media literacy today.
View the full essay and simulations by @j3ss3s33g3rs @spatialculturesthinkingpartner on CODE Archive — link in bio.
Slideshow:
01 LLM token embedding simulation
02 “Chapel d’Anet” (1547-52), designed by architect Philibert de l’Orme. Section perspective drawing by Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau, ca. 1570
03 Various network topologies / Network Media simulation
04-05 Rafaello, “School of Athens” (1509-1511) as schools of thought vectors, diagram by author
06 Outtake CODE 04 ‘Neural Media Literacy’
07 Decentralized topology / Network Media simulation
08 Still from music video for “AS Over” by @amnesiascanner, Directed by @freekatet
09 Distributed topology / Network Media simulation
10 Trainium GPU chip, Spencer Lowell for The New York Times
11 Centralized topology / Network Media simulation
Web Design @scissor_cloud
Projective Geometry is the ur-technology at the root of today’s AI-pilled-consciousness-questioning moment, yet it originated in the 1500s. Billion-dimensional token embeddings simulate language as a skeuomorph of human consciousness. What can we learn from 500 years ago to help us make sense of today?
‘Neural Media Literacy’ is an attempt at making sense of the media environment and creative landscape that new neural media technologies (AI, LLMs, Agents) have thrust upon us. Answers to the “is it conscious” question are made irrelevant in favor of reorienting the discussion towards “what effects can it have anyway?” Learning from reading topologies of network media structures, we can glimpse a new type of literacy emerging in the age of neural media.
Connecting the theoretical and mythological dots between Robin Evans’ architectural theory, the Orchestrated Objective Reduction Theory of Quantum Consciousness proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff (also in CODE issue 04), K Allado MacDowell’s history of neural media, Deadalus/Icarus Labyrinth myth, and recent video work by Freeka Tet and Amnesia Scanner, this essay is a critical meditation on emerging forms of media literacy today.
View the full essay and simulations by @j3ss3s33g3rs @spatialculturesthinkingpartner on CODE Archive — link in bio.
Slideshow:
01 LLM token embedding simulation
02 “Chapel d’Anet” (1547-52), designed by architect Philibert de l’Orme. Section perspective drawing by Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau, ca. 1570
03 Various network topologies / Network Media simulation
04-05 Rafaello, “School of Athens” (1509-1511) as schools of thought vectors, diagram by author
06 Outtake CODE 04 ‘Neural Media Literacy’
07 Decentralized topology / Network Media simulation
08 Still from music video for “AS Over” by @amnesiascanner, Directed by @freekatet
09 Distributed topology / Network Media simulation
10 Trainium GPU chip, Spencer Lowell for The New York Times
11 Centralized topology / Network Media simulation
Web Design @scissor_cloud
Projective Geometry is the ur-technology at the root of today’s AI-pilled-consciousness-questioning moment, yet it originated in the 1500s. Billion-dimensional token embeddings simulate language as a skeuomorph of human consciousness. What can we learn from 500 years ago to help us make sense of today?
‘Neural Media Literacy’ is an attempt at making sense of the media environment and creative landscape that new neural media technologies (AI, LLMs, Agents) have thrust upon us. Answers to the “is it conscious” question are made irrelevant in favor of reorienting the discussion towards “what effects can it have anyway?” Learning from reading topologies of network media structures, we can glimpse a new type of literacy emerging in the age of neural media.
Connecting the theoretical and mythological dots between Robin Evans’ architectural theory, the Orchestrated Objective Reduction Theory of Quantum Consciousness proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff (also in CODE issue 04), K Allado MacDowell’s history of neural media, Deadalus/Icarus Labyrinth myth, and recent video work by Freeka Tet and Amnesia Scanner, this essay is a critical meditation on emerging forms of media literacy today.
View the full essay and simulations by @j3ss3s33g3rs @spatialculturesthinkingpartner on CODE Archive — link in bio.
Slideshow:
01 LLM token embedding simulation
02 “Chapel d’Anet” (1547-52), designed by architect Philibert de l’Orme. Section perspective drawing by Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau, ca. 1570
03 Various network topologies / Network Media simulation
04-05 Rafaello, “School of Athens” (1509-1511) as schools of thought vectors, diagram by author
06 Outtake CODE 04 ‘Neural Media Literacy’
07 Decentralized topology / Network Media simulation
08 Still from music video for “AS Over” by @amnesiascanner, Directed by @freekatet
09 Distributed topology / Network Media simulation
10 Trainium GPU chip, Spencer Lowell for The New York Times
11 Centralized topology / Network Media simulation
Web Design @scissor_cloud
Projective Geometry is the ur-technology at the root of today’s AI-pilled-consciousness-questioning moment, yet it originated in the 1500s. Billion-dimensional token embeddings simulate language as a skeuomorph of human consciousness. What can we learn from 500 years ago to help us make sense of today?
‘Neural Media Literacy’ is an attempt at making sense of the media environment and creative landscape that new neural media technologies (AI, LLMs, Agents) have thrust upon us. Answers to the “is it conscious” question are made irrelevant in favor of reorienting the discussion towards “what effects can it have anyway?” Learning from reading topologies of network media structures, we can glimpse a new type of literacy emerging in the age of neural media.
Connecting the theoretical and mythological dots between Robin Evans’ architectural theory, the Orchestrated Objective Reduction Theory of Quantum Consciousness proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff (also in CODE issue 04), K Allado MacDowell’s history of neural media, Deadalus/Icarus Labyrinth myth, and recent video work by Freeka Tet and Amnesia Scanner, this essay is a critical meditation on emerging forms of media literacy today.
View the full essay and simulations by @j3ss3s33g3rs @spatialculturesthinkingpartner on CODE Archive — link in bio.
Slideshow:
01 LLM token embedding simulation
02 “Chapel d’Anet” (1547-52), designed by architect Philibert de l’Orme. Section perspective drawing by Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau, ca. 1570
03 Various network topologies / Network Media simulation
04-05 Rafaello, “School of Athens” (1509-1511) as schools of thought vectors, diagram by author
06 Outtake CODE 04 ‘Neural Media Literacy’
07 Decentralized topology / Network Media simulation
08 Still from music video for “AS Over” by @amnesiascanner, Directed by @freekatet
09 Distributed topology / Network Media simulation
10 Trainium GPU chip, Spencer Lowell for The New York Times
11 Centralized topology / Network Media simulation
Web Design @scissor_cloud
Projective Geometry is the ur-technology at the root of today’s AI-pilled-consciousness-questioning moment, yet it originated in the 1500s. Billion-dimensional token embeddings simulate language as a skeuomorph of human consciousness. What can we learn from 500 years ago to help us make sense of today?
‘Neural Media Literacy’ is an attempt at making sense of the media environment and creative landscape that new neural media technologies (AI, LLMs, Agents) have thrust upon us. Answers to the “is it conscious” question are made irrelevant in favor of reorienting the discussion towards “what effects can it have anyway?” Learning from reading topologies of network media structures, we can glimpse a new type of literacy emerging in the age of neural media.
Connecting the theoretical and mythological dots between Robin Evans’ architectural theory, the Orchestrated Objective Reduction Theory of Quantum Consciousness proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff (also in CODE issue 04), K Allado MacDowell’s history of neural media, Deadalus/Icarus Labyrinth myth, and recent video work by Freeka Tet and Amnesia Scanner, this essay is a critical meditation on emerging forms of media literacy today.
View the full essay and simulations by @j3ss3s33g3rs @spatialculturesthinkingpartner on CODE Archive — link in bio.
Slideshow:
01 LLM token embedding simulation
02 “Chapel d’Anet” (1547-52), designed by architect Philibert de l’Orme. Section perspective drawing by Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau, ca. 1570
03 Various network topologies / Network Media simulation
04-05 Rafaello, “School of Athens” (1509-1511) as schools of thought vectors, diagram by author
06 Outtake CODE 04 ‘Neural Media Literacy’
07 Decentralized topology / Network Media simulation
08 Still from music video for “AS Over” by @amnesiascanner, Directed by @freekatet
09 Distributed topology / Network Media simulation
10 Trainium GPU chip, Spencer Lowell for The New York Times
11 Centralized topology / Network Media simulation
Web Design @scissor_cloud
Projective Geometry is the ur-technology at the root of today’s AI-pilled-consciousness-questioning moment, yet it originated in the 1500s. Billion-dimensional token embeddings simulate language as a skeuomorph of human consciousness. What can we learn from 500 years ago to help us make sense of today?
‘Neural Media Literacy’ is an attempt at making sense of the media environment and creative landscape that new neural media technologies (AI, LLMs, Agents) have thrust upon us. Answers to the “is it conscious” question are made irrelevant in favor of reorienting the discussion towards “what effects can it have anyway?” Learning from reading topologies of network media structures, we can glimpse a new type of literacy emerging in the age of neural media.
Connecting the theoretical and mythological dots between Robin Evans’ architectural theory, the Orchestrated Objective Reduction Theory of Quantum Consciousness proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff (also in CODE issue 04), K Allado MacDowell’s history of neural media, Deadalus/Icarus Labyrinth myth, and recent video work by Freeka Tet and Amnesia Scanner, this essay is a critical meditation on emerging forms of media literacy today.
View the full essay and simulations by @j3ss3s33g3rs @spatialculturesthinkingpartner on CODE Archive — link in bio.
Slideshow:
01 LLM token embedding simulation
02 “Chapel d’Anet” (1547-52), designed by architect Philibert de l’Orme. Section perspective drawing by Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau, ca. 1570
03 Various network topologies / Network Media simulation
04-05 Rafaello, “School of Athens” (1509-1511) as schools of thought vectors, diagram by author
06 Outtake CODE 04 ‘Neural Media Literacy’
07 Decentralized topology / Network Media simulation
08 Still from music video for “AS Over” by @amnesiascanner, Directed by @freekatet
09 Distributed topology / Network Media simulation
10 Trainium GPU chip, Spencer Lowell for The New York Times
11 Centralized topology / Network Media simulation
Web Design @scissor_cloud
Projective Geometry is the ur-technology at the root of today’s AI-pilled-consciousness-questioning moment, yet it originated in the 1500s. Billion-dimensional token embeddings simulate language as a skeuomorph of human consciousness. What can we learn from 500 years ago to help us make sense of today?
‘Neural Media Literacy’ is an attempt at making sense of the media environment and creative landscape that new neural media technologies (AI, LLMs, Agents) have thrust upon us. Answers to the “is it conscious” question are made irrelevant in favor of reorienting the discussion towards “what effects can it have anyway?” Learning from reading topologies of network media structures, we can glimpse a new type of literacy emerging in the age of neural media.
Connecting the theoretical and mythological dots between Robin Evans’ architectural theory, the Orchestrated Objective Reduction Theory of Quantum Consciousness proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff (also in CODE issue 04), K Allado MacDowell’s history of neural media, Deadalus/Icarus Labyrinth myth, and recent video work by Freeka Tet and Amnesia Scanner, this essay is a critical meditation on emerging forms of media literacy today.
View the full essay and simulations by @j3ss3s33g3rs @spatialculturesthinkingpartner on CODE Archive — link in bio.
Slideshow:
01 LLM token embedding simulation
02 “Chapel d’Anet” (1547-52), designed by architect Philibert de l’Orme. Section perspective drawing by Jacques Androuet Du Cerceau, ca. 1570
03 Various network topologies / Network Media simulation
04-05 Rafaello, “School of Athens” (1509-1511) as schools of thought vectors, diagram by author
06 Outtake CODE 04 ‘Neural Media Literacy’
07 Decentralized topology / Network Media simulation
08 Still from music video for “AS Over” by @amnesiascanner, Directed by @freekatet
09 Distributed topology / Network Media simulation
10 Trainium GPU chip, Spencer Lowell for The New York Times
11 Centralized topology / Network Media simulation
Web Design @scissor_cloud
Ver Historias de Instagram en Secreto
El Instagram Story Viewer es una herramienta sencilla que te permite ver y guardar en secreto historias, videos, fotos o IGTV de Instagram. Con este servicio, puedes descargar contenido y disfrutarlo sin conexión cuando lo desees. Si encuentras algo interesante en Instagram que quieras revisar más tarde o si prefieres ver historias de forma anónima, nuestro visor es perfecto para ti. Anonstories ofrece una excelente solución para mantener tu identidad oculta. Instagram lanzó la función de Historias en agosto de 2023, adoptada rápidamente por otras plataformas debido a su formato dinámico y temporal. Las Historias permiten a los usuarios compartir actualizaciones rápidas, como fotos, videos o selfies, mejoradas con texto, emojis o filtros, y son visibles por solo 24 horas. Este marco de tiempo limitado genera un alto compromiso en comparación con las publicaciones regulares. En el mundo actual, las Historias son una de las formas más populares de conectar y comunicarse en redes sociales. Sin embargo, al ver una Historia, el creador puede ver tu nombre en su lista de visualizaciones, lo cual puede ser una preocupación de privacidad. ¿Qué hacer si deseas explorar Historias sin ser detectado? Aquí es donde Anonstories resulta útil. Te permite ver contenido público de Instagram sin revelar tu identidad. Simplemente ingresa el nombre de usuario del perfil que te interesa, y la herramienta mostrará sus Historias más recientes. Funciones de Anonstories Viewer: - Navegación anónima: Mira Historias sin aparecer en la lista de visualizaciones. - Sin cuenta requerida: Ve contenido público sin necesidad de registrarte en Instagram. - Descarga de contenido: Guarda cualquier Historia directamente en tu dispositivo para usarla sin conexión. - Ver Destacados: Accede a Destacados de Instagram, incluso fuera del período de 24 horas. - Monitoreo de reposts: Rastrea reposts o niveles de compromiso en Historias de perfiles personales. Limitaciones: - Esta herramienta solo funciona con cuentas públicas; las cuentas privadas permanecen inaccesibles. Beneficios: - Amigable con la privacidad: Mira cualquier contenido de Instagram sin ser detectado. - Fácil y sencillo: Sin instalación de aplicaciones ni registro necesario. - Herramientas exclusivas: Descarga y gestiona contenido de formas que Instagram no ofrece.