Instagram Story Viewer

The next level isn’t a dream—it’s a decision.
Comment “I’m Next” and I’ll DM you a limited time discount to get you started.

✅ Year round strength and conditioning (in-season, off season and pre season programs)
✅Comprehensive skill development system
✅Elite IQ training designed by D1 and NBA coaches

This program is getting players insanely athletic, strong and skilled. It’s translating to scholarship offers. It’s translating to big money at the professional level. The work is working!

Now you can train with our proven blueprint for around $1 per day 👀.

If you’re actually committed to transforming… I’m here to help. Keep me updated on your progress… see you on the program.

Want the exact bands + full exercise database I use with my athletes?
Comment “BIG BANDS” and I’ll DM you the link 🔗
(Also in our IG shop + on the website)

Let’s get to work 💪

@evanmobley4 moving like a 7 foot gazelle 🤌

The work is working.

I believe by 2030 the basketball “strength and conditioning coach” or “performance coach” will become a “strength and movement coach”.

The “Skills Coach” will become a “Skills, Performance and Conditioning Coach”.

The switch quietly happened over the last decade but the job titles still don’t reflect it.

As players continue to double down on year round play and on court training volumes keep rising, strength coaches have started removing a lot of plyometrics, agility work, and conditioning from their programs. They almost have no choice because their athletes are already getting so much of it on the court.

The strength coach then becomes someone who “fills buckets” that aren’t already being filled on the court, which is mostly resistance training and movement quality/mobility work.

From a conditioning standpoint I love the transfer of roles. The bulk of your conditioning SHOULD come through playing basketball and skills training. It transfers much better. It’s also more efficient. 2 birds with 1 stone.

The only lingering issue is the “performance” side. Players are doing super high volumes of accels, decels, jumps, etc. in their skill workouts so they can’t handle very much outside of their on-court work. But skills trainers usually aren’t well trained in this area to really understand load management, biomechanics, proper progressions, etc.

So you have a predicament where the skills coach is in the perfect environment to implement performance work and conditioning, but they aren’t trained in this area. Then you have the strength coach who is very well trained in these areas but they’re in the wrong environment to implement it.

I think step 1 is updating the job titles. Once skills coaches fully understand that THEY ARE the primary performance/conditioning coaches they will take a different approach with their education. I’m not saying they need degrees and certifications. Just some basic understanding of human movement and load management. It will go a long way for player health in the long run.

I believe by 2030 the basketball “strength and conditioning coach” or “performance coach” will become a “strength and movement coach”.

The “Skills Coach” will become a “Skills, Performance and Conditioning Coach”.

The switch quietly happened over the last decade but the job titles still don’t reflect it.

As players continue to double down on year round play and on court training volumes keep rising, strength coaches have started removing a lot of plyometrics, agility work, and conditioning from their programs. They almost have no choice because their athletes are already getting so much of it on the court.

The strength coach then becomes someone who “fills buckets” that aren’t already being filled on the court, which is mostly resistance training and movement quality/mobility work.

From a conditioning standpoint I love the transfer of roles. The bulk of your conditioning SHOULD come through playing basketball and skills training. It transfers much better. It’s also more efficient. 2 birds with 1 stone.

The only lingering issue is the “performance” side. Players are doing super high volumes of accels, decels, jumps, etc. in their skill workouts so they can’t handle very much outside of their on-court work. But skills trainers usually aren’t well trained in this area to really understand load management, biomechanics, proper progressions, etc.

So you have a predicament where the skills coach is in the perfect environment to implement performance work and conditioning, but they aren’t trained in this area. Then you have the strength coach who is very well trained in these areas but they’re in the wrong environment to implement it.

I think step 1 is updating the job titles. Once skills coaches fully understand that THEY ARE the primary performance/conditioning coaches they will take a different approach with their education. I’m not saying they need degrees and certifications. Just some basic understanding of human movement and load management. It will go a long way for player health in the long run.

I believe by 2030 the basketball “strength and conditioning coach” or “performance coach” will become a “strength and movement coach”.

The “Skills Coach” will become a “Skills, Performance and Conditioning Coach”.

The switch quietly happened over the last decade but the job titles still don’t reflect it.

As players continue to double down on year round play and on court training volumes keep rising, strength coaches have started removing a lot of plyometrics, agility work, and conditioning from their programs. They almost have no choice because their athletes are already getting so much of it on the court.

The strength coach then becomes someone who “fills buckets” that aren’t already being filled on the court, which is mostly resistance training and movement quality/mobility work.

From a conditioning standpoint I love the transfer of roles. The bulk of your conditioning SHOULD come through playing basketball and skills training. It transfers much better. It’s also more efficient. 2 birds with 1 stone.

The only lingering issue is the “performance” side. Players are doing super high volumes of accels, decels, jumps, etc. in their skill workouts so they can’t handle very much outside of their on-court work. But skills trainers usually aren’t well trained in this area to really understand load management, biomechanics, proper progressions, etc.

So you have a predicament where the skills coach is in the perfect environment to implement performance work and conditioning, but they aren’t trained in this area. Then you have the strength coach who is very well trained in these areas but they’re in the wrong environment to implement it.

I think step 1 is updating the job titles. Once skills coaches fully understand that THEY ARE the primary performance/conditioning coaches they will take a different approach with their education. I’m not saying they need degrees and certifications. Just some basic understanding of human movement and load management. It will go a long way for player health in the long run.

I believe by 2030 the basketball “strength and conditioning coach” or “performance coach” will become a “strength and movement coach”.

The “Skills Coach” will become a “Skills, Performance and Conditioning Coach”.

The switch quietly happened over the last decade but the job titles still don’t reflect it.

As players continue to double down on year round play and on court training volumes keep rising, strength coaches have started removing a lot of plyometrics, agility work, and conditioning from their programs. They almost have no choice because their athletes are already getting so much of it on the court.

The strength coach then becomes someone who “fills buckets” that aren’t already being filled on the court, which is mostly resistance training and movement quality/mobility work.

From a conditioning standpoint I love the transfer of roles. The bulk of your conditioning SHOULD come through playing basketball and skills training. It transfers much better. It’s also more efficient. 2 birds with 1 stone.

The only lingering issue is the “performance” side. Players are doing super high volumes of accels, decels, jumps, etc. in their skill workouts so they can’t handle very much outside of their on-court work. But skills trainers usually aren’t well trained in this area to really understand load management, biomechanics, proper progressions, etc.

So you have a predicament where the skills coach is in the perfect environment to implement performance work and conditioning, but they aren’t trained in this area. Then you have the strength coach who is very well trained in these areas but they’re in the wrong environment to implement it.

I think step 1 is updating the job titles. Once skills coaches fully understand that THEY ARE the primary performance/conditioning coaches they will take a different approach with their education. I’m not saying they need degrees and certifications. Just some basic understanding of human movement and load management. It will go a long way for player health in the long run.

I believe by 2030 the basketball “strength and conditioning coach” or “performance coach” will become a “strength and movement coach”.

The “Skills Coach” will become a “Skills, Performance and Conditioning Coach”.

The switch quietly happened over the last decade but the job titles still don’t reflect it.

As players continue to double down on year round play and on court training volumes keep rising, strength coaches have started removing a lot of plyometrics, agility work, and conditioning from their programs. They almost have no choice because their athletes are already getting so much of it on the court.

The strength coach then becomes someone who “fills buckets” that aren’t already being filled on the court, which is mostly resistance training and movement quality/mobility work.

From a conditioning standpoint I love the transfer of roles. The bulk of your conditioning SHOULD come through playing basketball and skills training. It transfers much better. It’s also more efficient. 2 birds with 1 stone.

The only lingering issue is the “performance” side. Players are doing super high volumes of accels, decels, jumps, etc. in their skill workouts so they can’t handle very much outside of their on-court work. But skills trainers usually aren’t well trained in this area to really understand load management, biomechanics, proper progressions, etc.

So you have a predicament where the skills coach is in the perfect environment to implement performance work and conditioning, but they aren’t trained in this area. Then you have the strength coach who is very well trained in these areas but they’re in the wrong environment to implement it.

I think step 1 is updating the job titles. Once skills coaches fully understand that THEY ARE the primary performance/conditioning coaches they will take a different approach with their education. I’m not saying they need degrees and certifications. Just some basic understanding of human movement and load management. It will go a long way for player health in the long run.

I believe by 2030 the basketball “strength and conditioning coach” or “performance coach” will become a “strength and movement coach”.

The “Skills Coach” will become a “Skills, Performance and Conditioning Coach”.

The switch quietly happened over the last decade but the job titles still don’t reflect it.

As players continue to double down on year round play and on court training volumes keep rising, strength coaches have started removing a lot of plyometrics, agility work, and conditioning from their programs. They almost have no choice because their athletes are already getting so much of it on the court.

The strength coach then becomes someone who “fills buckets” that aren’t already being filled on the court, which is mostly resistance training and movement quality/mobility work.

From a conditioning standpoint I love the transfer of roles. The bulk of your conditioning SHOULD come through playing basketball and skills training. It transfers much better. It’s also more efficient. 2 birds with 1 stone.

The only lingering issue is the “performance” side. Players are doing super high volumes of accels, decels, jumps, etc. in their skill workouts so they can’t handle very much outside of their on-court work. But skills trainers usually aren’t well trained in this area to really understand load management, biomechanics, proper progressions, etc.

So you have a predicament where the skills coach is in the perfect environment to implement performance work and conditioning, but they aren’t trained in this area. Then you have the strength coach who is very well trained in these areas but they’re in the wrong environment to implement it.

I think step 1 is updating the job titles. Once skills coaches fully understand that THEY ARE the primary performance/conditioning coaches they will take a different approach with their education. I’m not saying they need degrees and certifications. Just some basic understanding of human movement and load management. It will go a long way for player health in the long run.

Prime Tyson was on Twitch Code 30 years before it came out 👀. Comment “twitch code” for the full program. The program works for all sports and various levels! Let’s get started.

Movement snack of the day! Reverse RDL with The PJF Extended Length Bands 🤌.

Check IG shop or Link In Bio for the bands + full exercise database.

Movement snack of the day! Reverse RDL with The PJF Extended Length Bands 🤌.

Check IG shop or Link In Bio for the bands + full exercise database.

The combine hates gazelles.

Is it time to get rid of the 15 foot approach jump and move to an unlimited approach?!?

I don’t think GM’s care that much about the combine numbers outside of anthropometrics. But media and fans do seem to care!

The combine hates gazelles.

Is it time to get rid of the 15 foot approach jump and move to an unlimited approach?!?

I don’t think GM’s care that much about the combine numbers outside of anthropometrics. But media and fans do seem to care!

The combine hates gazelles.

Is it time to get rid of the 15 foot approach jump and move to an unlimited approach?!?

I don’t think GM’s care that much about the combine numbers outside of anthropometrics. But media and fans do seem to care!

The combine hates gazelles.

Is it time to get rid of the 15 foot approach jump and move to an unlimited approach?!?

I don’t think GM’s care that much about the combine numbers outside of anthropometrics. But media and fans do seem to care!

The combine hates gazelles.

Is it time to get rid of the 15 foot approach jump and move to an unlimited approach?!?

I don’t think GM’s care that much about the combine numbers outside of anthropometrics. But media and fans do seem to care!

The combine hates gazelles.

Is it time to get rid of the 15 foot approach jump and move to an unlimited approach?!?

I don’t think GM’s care that much about the combine numbers outside of anthropometrics. But media and fans do seem to care!

Max Overcoming Isometrics = very high fast twitch fiber activation. Just make sure that it’s a true 100% effort!

If you don’t have our PJF Extended Length Bands you can get them in our IG Shop or website (link in bio).

Change of direction athletes need to prioritize groin “prehab”.

I’ve found that poorly rehabbed groin strains often lead to changes in pelvic positioning/stability that eventually turns into a game of Whac-A-Mole (hamstring strain, followed by hip flexor, followed by calf, etc.)

Take your groin work seriously to reduce the risk of strains!

Comment “big bands” for the link to purchase our PJF Extended Length Bands + the exercise database/program.

Let’s work.

Change of direction athletes need to prioritize groin “prehab”.

I’ve found that poorly rehabbed groin strains often lead to changes in pelvic positioning/stability that eventually turns into a game of Whac-A-Mole (hamstring strain, followed by hip flexor, followed by calf, etc.)

Take your groin work seriously to reduce the risk of strains!

Comment “big bands” for the link to purchase our PJF Extended Length Bands + the exercise database/program.

Let’s work.

Change of direction athletes need to prioritize groin “prehab”.

I’ve found that poorly rehabbed groin strains often lead to changes in pelvic positioning/stability that eventually turns into a game of Whac-A-Mole (hamstring strain, followed by hip flexor, followed by calf, etc.)

Take your groin work seriously to reduce the risk of strains!

Comment “big bands” for the link to purchase our PJF Extended Length Bands + the exercise database/program.

Let’s work.

Comment “Big 4” and I’ll send you a free workout breaking down my top 4 drills for improving your change of direction speed!

Let’s work!

Undisputed light heavyweight champion, Dmitry Bivol, using our PJF Extended Length Bands with his S&C Coach @taylor_ramsdell 🔥.

Check IG shop or link in bio if you don’t have our bands yet!

If you want to get more athletic while simultaneously improving movement quality👇

Rotate your main “meat and potatoe” exercises less frequently. Rotate your auxiliary exercises and warmups more frequently.

That means we need to repeat your main exercises for long enough to actually master the movement and progressively load week after week. But the auxiliary exercises + warmups can be rotated often to provide more variety, which is key for improving overall movement quality, proprioception, “learning how to learn”, etc.

If you want to get more athletic while simultaneously improving movement quality👇

Rotate your main “meat and potatoe” exercises less frequently. Rotate your auxiliary exercises and warmups more frequently.

That means we need to repeat your main exercises for long enough to actually master the movement and progressively load week after week. But the auxiliary exercises + warmups can be rotated often to provide more variety, which is key for improving overall movement quality, proprioception, “learning how to learn”, etc.

If you want to get more athletic while simultaneously improving movement quality👇

Rotate your main “meat and potatoe” exercises less frequently. Rotate your auxiliary exercises and warmups more frequently.

That means we need to repeat your main exercises for long enough to actually master the movement and progressively load week after week. But the auxiliary exercises + warmups can be rotated often to provide more variety, which is key for improving overall movement quality, proprioception, “learning how to learn”, etc.

If you want to get more athletic while simultaneously improving movement quality👇

Rotate your main “meat and potatoe” exercises less frequently. Rotate your auxiliary exercises and warmups more frequently.

That means we need to repeat your main exercises for long enough to actually master the movement and progressively load week after week. But the auxiliary exercises + warmups can be rotated often to provide more variety, which is key for improving overall movement quality, proprioception, “learning how to learn”, etc.