Trình Xem Câu Chuyện Instagram

CODE 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

In a dream, the wolf moves. Through tunnels and in mirrors. In amplitudes and circuitry, and everywhere within or without a mind. She collapses the tunnel. She bites down and changes the world. However we dream it. However her pieces move.

This issue of CODE is the result of our team’s yearlong research and exploration of the quantum universe—a heady and transformative look at simultaneity and the spooky action we affect on each other across time and distances. Drawing on widely ranging topics — from chess and the poetics of anguish and love; to wave function collapse and neural media architecture; to the mysteriously universal nature and origins of consciousness itself — and with shoots from L.A. to Morocco, this is our boldest effort yet.

Featuring contributions from: Mowalola, Dylan Van Roost, Federico Campagna, Dr. Stuart Hameroff, Meriem Bennani, Arcin Sagdic, Dr. Aneil Mallavarapu, Hendrik Schneider, Ariana Reines, Melanie Glück, Jesse Seegers, Club Chess, Karl Felix, Vanessa Barros Andrade, Pierre Podevyn, Kynan Puru Watt, Jessica Mitrani

Cover 04a @mowalola photographed by @hendrik.schneider and styled by @vvutura
@grailed Archive Special

Editor in Chief & Creative Director
@mharieberger

Art Director
@mariefaass

Managing Editor
Natalie Mariko

Concept & Research
@deviantarthaute

Fashion Editors
@vvutura
@intl_4evr
@_nicowalker_
@aaaeeeffflll

Writers
Natalie Mariko
@deviantarthaute
@j3ss3s33g3rs
@ellena.basada
@mharieberger

Editors
@cinderella_exit
@deviantarthaute

Photographers
@dylanvanroost
@arcinsagdic
@hendrik.schneider
@ynaalem
@aaaeeeffflll
@pierrepodevyn
@karlfelix__

Photo Editing
@mariefaass

Advertising
@mharieberger

Print 
@gutenbergbeuys

Web
@scissor_cloud

Cusp Publishing

CODE 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

In a dream, the wolf moves. Through tunnels and in mirrors. In amplitudes and circuitry, and everywhere within or without a mind. She collapses the tunnel. She bites down and changes the world. However we dream it. However her pieces move.

This issue of CODE is the result of our team’s yearlong research and exploration of the quantum universe—a heady and transformative look at simultaneity and the spooky action we affect on each other across time and distances. Drawing on widely ranging topics — from chess and the poetics of anguish and love; to wave function collapse and neural media architecture; to the mysteriously universal nature and origins of consciousness itself — and with shoots from L.A. to Morocco, this is our boldest effort yet.

Featuring contributions from: Mowalola, Dylan Van Roost, Federico Campagna, Dr. Stuart Hameroff, Meriem Bennani, Arcin Sagdic, Dr. Aneil Mallavarapu, Hendrik Schneider, Ariana Reines, Melanie Glück, Jesse Seegers, Club Chess, Karl Felix, Vanessa Barros Andrade, Pierre Podevyn, Kynan Puru Watt, Jessica Mitrani

Cover 04a @mowalola photographed by @hendrik.schneider and styled by @vvutura
@grailed Archive Special

Editor in Chief & Creative Director
@mharieberger

Art Director
@mariefaass

Managing Editor
Natalie Mariko

Concept & Research
@deviantarthaute

Fashion Editors
@vvutura
@intl_4evr
@_nicowalker_
@aaaeeeffflll

Writers
Natalie Mariko
@deviantarthaute
@j3ss3s33g3rs
@ellena.basada
@mharieberger

Editors
@cinderella_exit
@deviantarthaute

Photographers
@dylanvanroost
@arcinsagdic
@hendrik.schneider
@ynaalem
@aaaeeeffflll
@pierrepodevyn
@karlfelix__

Photo Editing
@mariefaass

Advertising
@mharieberger

Print 
@gutenbergbeuys

Web
@scissor_cloud

Cusp Publishing

CODE 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

In a dream, the wolf moves. Through tunnels and in mirrors. In amplitudes and circuitry, and everywhere within or without a mind. She collapses the tunnel. She bites down and changes the world. However we dream it. However her pieces move.

This issue of CODE is the result of our team’s yearlong research and exploration of the quantum universe—a heady and transformative look at simultaneity and the spooky action we affect on each other across time and distances. Drawing on widely ranging topics — from chess and the poetics of anguish and love; to wave function collapse and neural media architecture; to the mysteriously universal nature and origins of consciousness itself — and with shoots from L.A. to Morocco, this is our boldest effort yet.

Featuring contributions from: Mowalola, Dylan Van Roost, Federico Campagna, Dr. Stuart Hameroff, Meriem Bennani, Arcin Sagdic, Dr. Aneil Mallavarapu, Hendrik Schneider, Ariana Reines, Melanie Glück, Jesse Seegers, Club Chess, Karl Felix, Vanessa Barros Andrade, Pierre Podevyn, Kynan Puru Watt, Jessica Mitrani

Cover 04b 16-4529 TPG by @arcinsagdic

Editor in Chief & Creative Director
@mharieberger

Art Director
@mariefaass

Managing Editor
Natalie Mariko

Concept & Research
@deviantarthaute

Fashion Editors
@vvutura
@intl_4evr
@_nicowalker_
@aaaeeeffflll

Writers
Natalie Mariko
@deviantarthaute
@j3ss3s33g3rs
@ellena.basada
@mharieberger

Editors
@cinderella_exit
@deviantarthaute

Photographers
@dylanvanroost
@arcinsagdic
@hendrik.schneider
@ynaalem
@aaaeeeffflll
@pierrepodevyn
@karlfelix__

Photo Editing
@mariefaass

Advertising
@mharieberger

Print 
@gutenbergbeuys

Web
@scissor_cloud

Cusp Publishing

CODE 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

In a dream, the wolf moves. Through tunnels and in mirrors. In amplitudes and circuitry, and everywhere within or without a mind. She collapses the tunnel. She bites down and changes the world. However we dream it. However her pieces move.

This issue of CODE is the result of our team’s yearlong research and exploration of the quantum universe—a heady and transformative look at simultaneity and the spooky action we affect on each other across time and distances. Drawing on widely ranging topics — from chess and the poetics of anguish and love; to wave function collapse and neural media architecture; to the mysteriously universal nature and origins of consciousness itself — and with shoots from L.A. to Morocco, this is our boldest effort yet.

Featuring contributions from: Mowalola, Dylan Van Roost, Federico Campagna, Dr. Stuart Hameroff, Meriem Bennani, Arcin Sagdic, Dr. Aneil Mallavarapu, Hendrik Schneider, Ariana Reines, Melanie Glück, Jesse Seegers, Club Chess, Karl Felix, Vanessa Barros Andrade, Pierre Podevyn, Kynan Puru Watt, Jessica Mitrani

Cover 04b 16-4529 TPG by @arcinsagdic

Editor in Chief & Creative Director
@mharieberger

Art Director
@mariefaass

Managing Editor
Natalie Mariko

Concept & Research
@deviantarthaute

Fashion Editors
@vvutura
@intl_4evr
@_nicowalker_
@aaaeeeffflll

Writers
Natalie Mariko
@deviantarthaute
@j3ss3s33g3rs
@ellena.basada
@mharieberger

Editors
@cinderella_exit
@deviantarthaute

Photographers
@dylanvanroost
@arcinsagdic
@hendrik.schneider
@ynaalem
@aaaeeeffflll
@pierrepodevyn
@karlfelix__

Photo Editing
@mariefaass

Advertising
@mharieberger

Print 
@gutenbergbeuys

Web
@scissor_cloud

Cusp Publishing

Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor

Seeing is believing, right?

Maybe,

we’ll see.

The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.

What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.

The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.

Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.

The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.

Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor

Seeing is believing, right?

Maybe,

we’ll see.

The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.

What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.

The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.

Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.

The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.

Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor

Seeing is believing, right?

Maybe,

we’ll see.

The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.

What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.

The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.

Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.

The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.

Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor

Seeing is believing, right?

Maybe,

we’ll see.

The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.

What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.

The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.

Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.

The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.

Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor

Seeing is believing, right?

Maybe,

we’ll see.

The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.

What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.

The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.

Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.

The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.

Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor

Seeing is believing, right?

Maybe,

we’ll see.

The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.

What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.

The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.

Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.

The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.

Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor

Seeing is believing, right?

Maybe,

we’ll see.

The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.

What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.

The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.

Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.

The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.

Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor

Seeing is believing, right?

Maybe,

we’ll see.

The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.

What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.

The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.

Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.

The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.

Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor

Seeing is believing, right?

Maybe,

we’ll see.

The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.

What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.

The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.

Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.

The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.

Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor

Seeing is believing, right?

Maybe,

we’ll see.

The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.

What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.

The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.

Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.

The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.

Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor

Seeing is believing, right?

Maybe,

we’ll see.

The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.

What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.

The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.

Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.

The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.

Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor

Seeing is believing, right?

Maybe,

we’ll see.

The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.

What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.

The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.

Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.

The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.

Excerpt from White Light—A letter from the editor

Seeing is believing, right?

Maybe,

we’ll see.

The Quanti·verse has been an exploration, an investigation into the history and present of quantum theory that led our team through a cyclical labyrinth of sensemaking.

What I came to realise through this winding descent was how much I relied on the certainty of clarity, and how my insistence on definite answers may have been preventing me from finding truth altogether. There are meanings for which language is inadequate. In this issue, we enter such a place, a plane where the literal and the empirical cannot be trusted.

The year 2025 marked a century since the emergence of modern quantum mechanics. While the theory’s technological impact is undeniable, many foundational assumptions remain conceptually unresolved. In retrospect, aspects of early quantum theory appear not only incomplete but potentially misleading.

Quantum reality and classical reality are not the same. Classical reality describes a cup visible to the naked eye resting on a table. Quantum reality refers to the underlying field of possibilities that precedes it, and we lack the tools to experience or describe that reality. It’s the exhaustion of both language and of the eye—of having to see something to believe it, to measure something for it to be true or having to name something in order for it to be. In the words of the famous physicist Werner Heisenberg, what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning. And nature does not follow a binary system. It’s not 0s or 1s, not an either/or, it’s in the tension of the and. The mystery and the understanding.

The distinction between mind and matter, body and soul, is only literal. It all exists in superposition at once. Everything psychological has a purpose, and the spiritual reality of man is what colours are to white light.

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Is the brain’s quantum activity the missing link to understanding consciousness?

Dr. Stuart Hameroff – anaesthesiologist, professor and lead organiser of The Science of Consciousness Conference – has spent decades exploring this question. Together with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Sir Roger Penrose, he developed the Orch-OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) theory, proposing that consciousness arises from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules—processes they believe are fundamentally interwoven with the geometry of spacetime.

“Consciousness is more like music than it is a computation, It’s hard to get a computer to be conscious for a number of reasons, including the fact that it’s completely algorithmic. Music in spacetime is closer to what consciousness actually is. It connects down to the Planck scale (space-time geometry), from which all fundamental things must come-such as spin, mass or charge. Consciousness is connecting our brains to the fine-scale geometry of the universe, which oscillates and resonates up the hierarchy to our brains. Like music, at multiple scales.”

Excerpt from “Quantum Consciousness” - Dr. Stuart Hameroff in conversation with @mharieberger

Read the full interview in CODE issue 04, THE QUANTI·VERSE

Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”

As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.

Stills by @dylanvanroost

Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”

As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.

Stills by @dylanvanroost

Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”

As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.

Stills by @dylanvanroost

Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”

As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.

Stills by @dylanvanroost

Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”

As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.

Stills by @dylanvanroost

Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”

As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.

Stills by @dylanvanroost

Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”

As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.

Stills by @dylanvanroost

Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”

As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.

Stills by @dylanvanroost

Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”

As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.

Stills by @dylanvanroost

Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”

As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.

Stills by @dylanvanroost

Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”

As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.

Stills by @dylanvanroost

Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”

As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.

Stills by @dylanvanroost

Heligoland
/ˈhɛlɪɡoʊˌlænd/
from German Helgoland (earlier Heiligeland), “holy land.”

As a tribute to one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, we traveled to the island of Helgoland, where the German physicist Werner Heisenberg developed the mathematical framework behind the uncertainty principle. He had retreated to the island to escape his severe pollen allergies — Helgoland’s stark, treeless landscape offered a rare refuge where he could work uninterrupted.
It is said that, in his solitude, Heisenberg passed the time reciting Goethe’s West–östlicher Divan, immersed in ideas that would become one of the defining breakthroughs in the development of quantum physics as we know it today.

Stills by @dylanvanroost

Product shots from Issue 04

Product shots from Issue 04

Product shots from Issue 04

Product shots from Issue 04

Product shots from Issue 04

NAIMA meets CODE.

Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.

CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.

NAIMA meets CODE.

Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.

CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.

NAIMA meets CODE.

Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.

CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.

NAIMA meets CODE.

Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.

CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.

NAIMA meets CODE.

Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.

CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.

NAIMA meets CODE.

Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.

CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.

NAIMA meets CODE.

Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.

CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.

NAIMA meets CODE.

Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.

CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.

NAIMA meets CODE.

Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.

CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.

NAIMA meets CODE.

Ahmed Alramly, editor-in-chief, asked Marie Berger, editor-in-chief, (@mharieberger) for 10 books that have shaped CODE’s research. The selection reflects CODE’s broader intention: closing gaps between communities and fostering meaningful exchange.

CODE’s aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersection of art, technology, spirituality, and science.

@skipfame special for CODE 04

Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor

Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting

Hair @liv_gate

Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_

Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz

@skipfame special for CODE 04

Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor

Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting

Hair @liv_gate

Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_

Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz

@skipfame special for CODE 04

Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor

Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting

Hair @liv_gate

Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_

Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz

@skipfame special for CODE 04

Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor

Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting

Hair @liv_gate

Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_

Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz

@skipfame special for CODE 04

Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor

Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting

Hair @liv_gate

Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_

Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz

@skipfame special for CODE 04

Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor

Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting

Hair @liv_gate

Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_

Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz

@skipfame special for CODE 04

Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor

Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting

Hair @liv_gate

Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_

Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz

@skipfame special for CODE 04

Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor

Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting

Hair @liv_gate

Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_

Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz

@skipfame special for CODE 04

Photographer @ynaalem
Stylist @intlcolor

Talent Antonio
Casting @ledixieme @ld_casting

Hair @liv_gate

Fashion Assistant @gearupkyto @sofietche_

Producers @sofietche_ @mharieberger @sibelhuz

“I See Me, in You, in Chess”

A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute

Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki

“I See Me, in You, in Chess”

A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute

Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki

“I See Me, in You, in Chess”

A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute

Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki

“I See Me, in You, in Chess”

A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute

Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki

“I See Me, in You, in Chess”

A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute

Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki

“I See Me, in You, in Chess”

A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute

Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki

“I See Me, in You, in Chess”

A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute

Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki

“I See Me, in You, in Chess”

A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute

Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki

“I See Me, in You, in Chess”

A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute

Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki

“I See Me, in You, in Chess”

A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute

Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki

“I See Me, in You, in Chess”

A conversation with Club Chess and Vanessa Barros Andrade from CODE 04, available now ♟️
@clubchess.club
@deviantarthaute

Chessboard
Concept @deviantarthaute
Talents @corrineciani & @quietluke
Photographer @thejoaquincastillo
Art Direction @mariefaass
Makeup @sophie_hartnett
Hair @mharieberger
Camera Assistant @itsemmanuelec
Photo Assistants @sqliff & @trashbunnii
lighting Assistant @shannadeneux
Producer @miasframes
PA @leinamisaki

MAYBE WE’LL SEE

Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE

Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody

MAYBE WE’LL SEE

Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE

Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody

MAYBE WE’LL SEE

Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE

Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody

MAYBE WE’LL SEE

Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE

Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody

MAYBE WE’LL SEE

Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE

Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody

MAYBE WE’LL SEE

Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE

Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody

MAYBE WE’LL SEE

Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE

Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody

MAYBE WE’LL SEE

Stills from CODE 04: THE QUANTI·VERSE

Art by Kynan Puru Watt @wifiovermybody

THE SELF 
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special

Video Excerpts by @7.9999a

Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria

THE SELF 
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special

Video Excerpts by @7.9999a

Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria

THE SELF 
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special

Video Excerpts by @7.9999a

Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria

THE SELF 
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special

Video Excerpts by @7.9999a

Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria

THE SELF 
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special

Video Excerpts by @7.9999a

Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria

THE SELF 
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special

Video Excerpts by @7.9999a

Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria

THE SELF 
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special

Video Excerpts by @7.9999a

Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria

THE SELF 
CODE 04
@grailed Archive Special

Video Excerpts by @7.9999a

Talent @mowalola
Stylist @vvutura
Models @chi @anncekora Storm at Storm Mgmt, @iammijon at Storm Mgmt, @raven.schexnayder
Casting @____dax______
Hair @unclelee
Hair Assist @so_phiaflores @stephanie.aldana @glenda_hairandbeauty
Make-Up @zaheersyn
Make-Up Assist @lilynalbandyan
Photo Assist @tsantana.photo
Styling Assist @error404priestess , Celeste Caceu, Crystal Okonkwo, Tatianna Hechavarria
Executive Producer @chris.yellen
Producer @carlo.p
Production Coordinator @srrytodisappoint
PA @andytangent
Production Assist Josh Alarcon
Special Thank you @everythingihatee @willnoyce @bigkid.tv @agnes.azria

At CODE, we believe the most insightful and compelling conversations emerge in the space between disciplines. Whether through a shared language, a craft, or a curiosity that pushes beyond the boundaries of individual fields, we seek to connect the forces at play—bridging perspectives, practices, and strands of interdisciplinary research.

This reflects our broader intention: to close the gaps between communities and foster meaningful exchange. Our aim is to bring together musicians, artists, scientists, and cultural thinkers at the intersections of art, technology, spirituality, and the sciences.