Instagram Story Viewer

@aman festive campaign I directed and photographed.
Magical freedom experiences with an elite team — a journey to remember.

shot by @james____beattie edited by doctor @aitorbigas scored by @stereo___image and graded by @timmasick stylism @reinaogawaclarke

thank you so much for the experience it was pure joy @tommymonkeyfellow

big luv always @wefolkagency @purple_martin_studio @chloeperignon @0h_amy and the local crew/productions who killed it every dawn!

creative direction @aleks__szym @madderlake.studio

model @miayea

Stereo Image is an independent “one-stop shop” for original music composition and creative sound design.

The expertise of Stereo Image is in advertising : film scores, fashion runway soundtracks, and exhibition soundscapes. The office is currently broadening its scope to sound for products, digital platforms, and interactive multimedia.

Original Music & Creative Sound Design by Pierre Rousseau @prsseau
Management by Alexandre Gaulmin @gaulminou
Identity by Faye And Gina @fayeandgina
Edit by Gwen Ghelid @gwenghelid

Featuring :

1. Rimowa ‘Pilot Case’ by Albert Moya @albert__moya @rimowa
2. ‘À Ta Recherche’ by Caroline Corbasson @carolinecorbasson
3. Mercedes-Benz X Moncler ‘The Art Of Imagination’ by Thibaut Grevet @thibautgrevet @mercedesbenz @moncler
4. Études ‘Twenty’ by Grégoire Dyer @gregoiredyer @etudes
5. Marine Serre ‘Amor Fati’ by Sacha Barbin & Ryan Doubiago @sachabarbin @doubidoubz @marineserre_official
6. ‘Cultes’ by La Horde @la.horde
7. Calvin Klein ‘Performance’ by Thibaut Grevet @thibautgrevet @calvinklein
8. Études X Yves Klein by Chemsedine Herriche @chemsedineherriche @etudes
9. Ill-Studio X Varier Furniture ‘Mind Gravity’ by Thibaut Grevet @thibautgrevet @illstudio @varierfurniture
10. Varier Furniture ‘Ekstrem’ by Teitur Ardal @teiturardal @varierfurniture
11. ‘Worlds’ by Caroline Corbasson @carolinecorbasson
12. Mercedes-Benz X Heron Preston ‘Airbag’ by Ill-Studio & Thibaut Grevet @thibautgrevet @illstudio @heronpreston @mercedesbenz
13. Rimowa ‘Deconstructed’ @rimowa
14. Études ‘Archive Days’ by Chemsedine Herriche @chemsedineherriche @etudes
15. Loewe X On ‘Cloudtilt’ by Thibaut Grevet @thibautgrevet @loewe @on
16. Rimowa ‘Love Letter’ by Thibaut Grevet @thibautgrevet @rimowa
17. ‘Hysteria’ by Théo Casciani @theocasciani
18. Equinox ‘It’s Not Fitness, It’s Life’ @equinox
19. Nike Football ‘Mercurial’ @nikefootball
20. Marine Serre ‘Heartbeat’ by Ewen Spencer @ewenspencer @marineserre_official
21. Marine Serre ‘Rising Shelter’ by Titre Provisoire @titreprovisoire @marineserre_official
22. Moncler ‘Daynamic’ by Thibaut Grevet @thibautgrevet @moncler

Stereo Image 2026 :

Salomon @salomon “Shaping New Futures”, directed by UNVEIL® @byunveil.

With echoes of contemporary minimalism and forward-leaning production, sculpted synthetic layers unfold along a slow, deliberate trajectory. Anchored by a restrained harmonic foundation, the composition subtly evolves as new visual textures emerge, fluidly supporting transitions from one scene to the next while maintaining technical precision. A measured pulse suggests controlled motion rather than momentum, allowing the visuals to retain clarity and intention.

Discrete sound design gestures—clean rises, low-frequency weight, and carefully timed accents—articulate scene changes and guide the viewer through the film’s narrative progression. Together, the music and creative sound design form a focused, unified framework : understated yet authoritative, expressing the brand’s commitment to innovation, structure, and future-facing design.

Original Music by Stereo Image @stereo___image
Management by Alexandre Gaulmin @gaulminou

© 2026 Stereo Image – APATO

Credits :

Salomon Team : @scottmellin, @nparky, @samanthalinley, Floriane Bonte.

Agency : @bbdo.paris
Production : @loveboat_content
Executive Producer : @frenchghost

Director of Photography@sandervandenbroucke
Editing : @marco__novoa
Original Music & Sound Design : @stereo___image
Additional AI Artists : @machado.cgi, @paragorika
Talent : @anna__barber
Stylist : @isabella.damazio
1st Assistant Stylist : @robbie.van.mierlo
Line Producer : @bertillemuguet
Production Coordinator : @hugopierens

Post-Production : @everest_studio
Post-Production Manager : @jefftinard
Color Grading : @florian_martiny
Voice-Over Casting : @aocprod

Stereo Image 2026 :

Mercedes-Benz @mercedesbenz “From 1886 to 2026 – 140 Years of Innovation”, directed by Haw-Lin Services @hawlinservices, produced by Services United @servicesunited.eu.

A refined visual essay tracing invention, identity, and future-facing design through the lineage of Mercedes-Benz. Through a measured progression from the 1886 Patent-Motorwagen to contemporary electric mobility, the film constructs a narrative of continuity — where heritage is not preserved as memory alone, but reactivated as vision.

Built around a restrained cinematic pulse, the music supports the film’s progression with subtle synth textures, minimalist orchestral references and carefully timed transitions. Its slow, deliberate evolution mirrors the narrative arc, moving seamlessly from heritage to future-facing innovation while giving space to the voice-over and visuals. Understated yet precise, the score helps unify the film’s sense of legacy, movement, and vision.

Original Music by Stereo Image @stereo___image
Management by Alexandre Gaulmin @gaulminou

© 2026 Stereo Image – APATO

Credits :

Director & Photography : @hawlinservices
DOP : @robertwisniewski_
1st AC : @kalle.kallovsky
2nd AC : @propanee
Grip : @malan3062
DIT : @perdu.film
Light : @antonandalus
Assistants : @andreaskrufczik, @julius.erdmann
Digi Tech : @raul__suciu
Production : @servicesunited.eu

Special thanks to Michael Mein @micmein at Mercedes-Benz @mercedesbenz and Sina Linke @sinalinke at Services United @servicesunited.eu.

@nike Fever Pitch campaign ⛓️‍💥

thank you for this crazy one @davidmfrank @groteskito @sneaky_pix and creative @stacks.studio @honeyhole @rebeccacianfrini @othelo_gervacio @blake1ewis ⛓️‍💥

photographer / Director
@marvin.leuvrey

athletes
@ronaldinho @ethannwaneri @cunha @lj10  @khalilwants

legends everywhere.. cinematographer @jake_gabbay @afrazamara on set and @john_colver for styling, movement @manuloca_ !⛓️‍💥

produced by @wearecounsel @liz__reid @olyasiniakov @christogarfield
hair @tomohiroohashihair
makeup @laurenfreynolds
manicurist @adamslee_
post production @purple_martin_studio
editor @louishvejselbork
original music @stereo___image
colorist @johnlowe.xyz

&big luv @wefolkagency @0h_amy

©️director’s cut

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

POV

The 21st-century human being, perhaps more than any who came before, appears fundamentally tethered to the primacy of subjective experience. This is etched into our habits, reflected in our technologies, and echoed in our conversations : an ever-expanding pursuit of experience for the sake of it—layered, curated, intensified—driven less by meaning than by the momentum of seeking.

Then what is it, that is everywhere but always looked for ?

Experience, as the space of consciousness, is inherently subjective—undoubtedly both virtual and real—and so deeply natural that it can appear, in fact, artificial. It is our most intimate possession—what makes the red you see that redness it is. The paradox is that our own experience is the only aspect of reality each of us is absolutely certain of, while remaining one of science’s most persistent “hard problems” to explain, ever since the cognitive revolution nearly 75,000 years ago.

Being so fundamentally qualitative, human experience— in its truest but most absurd form—can’t be measured. It’s always there, always streaming, and thus simply has no quantitative value. Some people are content in the midst of deprivation and danger, while others feel miserable despite having all the pleasures of the world. This is not to say that external circumstances do not matter—but it is your mind, rather than circumstances themselves, that largely determines the quality of your experience. Your mind is the basis and origin of everything you live, and of every contribution you make to the lives of others. It is fundamentally all there is—and given this limited means—it might make sense to observe, understand, and even investigate this mind.

Recognizing experience in the form of a spatially structuring process (and not as an accumulation of moments) is an unconventional way to think of a space as a field of sensorial information rather than a static object—something that can be navigated, practiced and responded to, while simply mirroring the only content we can ever have in mind: experience itself.
-
@on SS26 Special Projects
-
Photography @opheliemrs
Soundscape @prsseau @stereo___image

Stereo Image Archive :

Études Studio @etudesstudio X Yves Klein @yvesklein_archives (2022) by Chemsedine Herriche @chemsedineherriche.

A short-form soundtrack created for a visual study inspired by Yves Klein, drawing from the raw physicality and minimal palette of the artist’s practice.

The composition revolves around a single sonic gesture — a shifting, textural drone that reflects Klein’s exploration of presence and void. The sparse sonic landscape emphasizes tactility and space, resonating with the blue monochrome and gestural imprints on screen.

Subtle distortions and resonant low-end frequencies give weight to movement, anchoring the silence between visual frames. The result is meditative yet physical, offering a sonic interpretation of Klein’s spatial approach.

Original Music by Pierre Rousseau @prsseau
Management by Alexandre Gaulmin @gaulminou

© 2022 Stereo Image - APATO

Stereo Image Archive :

Calvin Klein @calvinklein « Performance » (2022), directed by Thibaut Grevet @thibautgrevet, produced by Division @division.global.

A soundtrack for a video promoting Calvin Klein’s « Performance » line.

The composition is anchored in a steady pulse and low-frequency movement, reflecting the controlled strength and focused energy of the performers. Layers of synthetic textures evolve throughout the piece, mirroring the progression of physical effort and repetition.

Minimal percussion and processed environmental recordings underscore the choreography and editing, allowing motion to drive rhythm. Gradual harmonic shifts provide contrast between tension and release, aligning with the visual interplay of form and athleticism.

Creative sound design plays a central role — sonic gestures are used to accentuate cuts, emphasize breath, and support the film’s raw, tactile quality. The music holds back from traditional resolution, opting instead for a suspended, unresolved momentum.

Original Music & Creative Sound Design by Pierre Rousseau @prsseau
Management by Alexandre Gaulmin @gaulminou

© 2022 Stereo Image - APATO

Stereo Image 2025 :

Giorgio Armani @giorgioarmani SS25, directed by Alexandre Silberstein @alexandresilberstein, produced by The Box Films @theboxfilms.

A soundtrack for the Giorgio Armani SS25 global campaign, shot in Milan-Centrale.

The music is sequenced in three parts (tension, build, release), and makes use of train recordings identifiably, as sounds of steam engines, railroad crossing alerts or even horns are weaved into the composition itself, emphasising the urgency of departure.

Original Music and Creative Sound Design @stereo___image
Management by Alexandre Gaulmin @gaulminou

© 2025 Stereo Image - APATO

Stereo Image Archive :

Varier @varierfurniture « Ekstrem in Gentle » (2022), directed by Teitur Ardal @teiturardal, creative direction by Viktor Agaton @viktoragaton at Barkas @barkas.

A soundtrack for a video announcing the latest iteration of the « Ekstrem » chair by Varier @varierfurniture, originally designed in 1984 by Terje Ekstrom.

The progression of both the music and sound design is dictated by the edit, associating key melodic elements and creative sound design experiments to key shots and movements.

Original Music by Pierre Rousseau @prsseau
Management by Alexandre Gaulmin @gaulminou

© 2025 Stereo Image - APATO

Stereo Image Archive :

Loewe @loewe X On @on « Cloudtilt » (2023), directed by Thibaut Grevet @thibautgrevet, produced by Division @division.global.

A soundtrack for a video announcing a collaboration between Loewe @loewe and On @on, focusing on their « Cloudtilt » shoe.

The music is built around a core vocal sound, which is present throughout the film. This vocal sound is constantly morphing as the composition evolves, evoking the flexibility of both the models and the materials of the shoe itself.

The first part of the soundtrack is intentionally sparse, in order to resonate with the space in the shots. Creative sound design gives the cuts in the edit additional weight, with particular sonic textures highlighting specific visual techniques. The composition becomes more dense midway through the film, with the introduction of a synthetic arpeggio as well as light percussion, assembled from various recordings of footsteps. The resolution is accompanied by string instruments, which emphasise the sense of movement and the allusions to contemporary dance.

Original Music by Pierre Rousseau @prsseau
Management by Alexandre Gaulmin @gaulminou

© 2025 Stereo Image - APATO

Stereo Image Archive :

Rimowa @rimowa « Pilot Case » (2023), directed by Albert Moya @albert__moya, creative direction by Marin Mornieux @marin.mornieux.

A soundtrack for a short video celebrating the return of Rimowa’s iconic pilot case, with additional sound design by Moritz Staub @moritz.staub.

The music is structured in three parts, with a mysterious introduction, an epic “lift-off”, and an intentionally ambiguous conclusion, as the main character advances into the unknown.

The composition draws inspiration from contemporary science-fiction soundtracks and early 20th century French impressionism. The instrumentation and general sound treatment pay close attention to the set design and general colouring of the film, with a particular accent on colder, reverberant tones at first, in order to install a form of tension, only later introducing a “human touch” with a distant vocal pattern and an orchestral arrangement to relieve suspense.

Original Music by Pierre Rousseau @prsseau
Management by Alexandre Gaulmin @gaulminou

© 2025 Stereo Image - APATO